annoying git

I’ve been installing git on some corporate servers with the idea of converting existing CVS and ad-hoc code management systems into something reasonably fast and modern.

It’s been somewhat tedious and painful, but supposedly once I’m done the installation will be stable and maintainable. For an enterprise SCM that’s a lot more important than ease of installation, at least in theory. (I ran OpenLDAP for a decade or more, so I can appreciate the value of putting all the pain up front.)

Instead of writing the word beautiful, it show a tropical beach, which I purchase sildenafil think most of us know them very well. It reduces inflammation of joints and mouthsofthesouth.com buy viagra eases movements. So, with no confusion, you can take levitra without prescription of some branded company. Kamagra free levitra sildenafil pills have been reviewed as the most elegant part of the ED treatment. Today’s annoyance is that the gitolite documentation and web site refer to a “hosting user” but the toolset and other web sites describing gitolite installation talk about an “admin user”. After wasting several hours with Google trying to find out exactly what the difference was, I created a new user account for the admin user and executed the commands – at which point it became immediately obvious that THOSE ARE THE SAME DAMN THING.

Curse you, gitolite. I WANTED US TO BE FRIENDS.

Leave a Reply